How companies design settlements that address multiple products and patents while managing future releases, portfolio scope, and downstream risk.

Practical challenges in assessing infringement, preserving evidence, and aligning litigation strategy when products evolve through frequent updates and feature releases.

Claim construction strategy for complex product ecosystems, where alleged infringement spans hardware, software, cloud services, and third-party components.

How defendants identify funded cases in practice and adjust timing, motion strategy, and settlement posture to exploit funder economics and decision constraints.

How and when to use ex parte re-examination to narrow or reshape asserted claims, weaken infringement theories, and create leverage without the visibility or estoppel risks of IPR.

As life sciences patent disputes increasingly span multiple jurisdictions and rely on a wider range of venues beyond the traditional US forums, litigation in the ITC, UPC and Brazil are becoming increasingly viable options. This session compares the benefits of these jurisdictions and sequencing forums to maximise leverage, manage risk, and protect market access across the ITC, UPC and Brazil.

• Deciding between the ITC, UPC, and Brazil based on speed, remedies, and procedural posture.
• When ITC Section 337 actions provide strategic advantage alongside or instead of Hatch-Waxman or BPCIA litigation.
• How the UPC and Brazilian courts offer injunction pressure unavailable in US proceedings.
• How venue choice affects discovery scope, timing, and settlement leverage in pharma and biologics patent disputes.
• Coordinating US, European, and Brazilian actions to manage estoppel, delay, and strategic enforcement.

From MedTech devices and AI-enabled hardware to cloud platforms and AI drug discovery, AI technologies are increasingly central to inventorship and innovation across sectors. As AI becomes embedded in regulated medical technologies such as Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and AI-enabled diagnostics, new evidentiary and regulatory considerations are emerging in patent disputes. This session reviews recent AI-related patent cases and examines how courts are shaping litigation and portfolio strategy going forward.

• How are parameters around patent eligibility evolving in AI cases.
• How litigation strategy and outcomes vary across a range of tech sectors including AI-enabled hardware, software, multifunction innovation products and MedTech.
• Address new evidentiary and regulatory considerations for handling AI in regulated technologies such as SaMD.
• How are infringement theories are being used in AI patent litigation.
• A review of recent cases like Nueral AI, LLC v. NVIDIA Corp., and Solos Technology’s complaint against Meta and EssilorLuxottica.

The rise of the 505(b)(2) pathway is changing how branded pharmaceutical and biotech companies approach lifecycle management and litigation. Unlike ANDA generics, 505(b)(2) applicants can enter earlier with differentiated products while relying on branded data, creating a hybrid competitive threat that often falls outside traditional Orange Book assumptions. Join this workshop to hear a discussion around defence strategies from a panel of experts from the generic and innovator industries.

• How in-house teams can identify and defend against 505(b)(2) challenges.
• Distinguish ANDA generics from 505(b)(2) applicants and the implications for defence strategy.
• Identify early warning signs through development activity, regulatory engagement, and competitor monitoring.
• Analyse how formulation, dosing, and delivery changes are used to avoid listed patents.