| Page 17 | Kisaco Research

Mergers and acquisition bring about profound risk for the loss or theft of proprietary information, with he added complications of uncatalogued trade secrets and departing employees with deep process knowledge only increasing these risks. This session will discuss practical strategies that in-house teams are implementing to mitigate these risks and allow for smooth M&A proceedings.

  • Integration of M&A systems to prevent risk during acquisition, and balance restrictive covenants.
  • How to mitigate the risk posed by departing employees with deep process knowledge.
  • Balancing enforcement with workforce mobility and ensuring that morale and professionality is maintained.
  • Strategies for joint development M&A.

Author:

Lana Gladstein

General Counsel
Seaport Therapeutics

Lana Gladstein currently works as a General Counsel for Seaport Therapeutics. She previously worked at APRINOIA Therapeutics as a Group General Counsel. Lana Gladstein attended Northeastern University School of Law.

Lana Gladstein

General Counsel
Seaport Therapeutics

Lana Gladstein currently works as a General Counsel for Seaport Therapeutics. She previously worked at APRINOIA Therapeutics as a Group General Counsel. Lana Gladstein attended Northeastern University School of Law.

Author:

Jim Gale

IP Litigation Co-Chair
Cozen O'Connor

Jim Gale

IP Litigation Co-Chair
Cozen O'Connor

Beyond legal risk, trade secret disputes can result in catastrophic knock-on effects throughout a business: they can disrupt operations, drain technical teams, and affect investor confidence for years. This fireside chat looks at how in-house teams manage trade secret litigation when the stakes extend far beyond the courtroom.

  • How litigation strategy changes when trade secret disputes become ‘bet-the-business’ matters.
  • Managing discovery scope, technical witness fatigue, and internal disruption over multi-year disputes.
  • Navigating investor relations, disclosure obligations, and activist pressure during ongoing litigation.
  • Decision-making around settlement, arbitration, or escalation when business survival is at stake.

Author:

Brian Walters

Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Matthews International

Brian D. Walters serves as Executive Vice-President and General Counsel for Matthews International Corporation, Pittsburgh’s oldest company in continuous operation since 1850 and operating in over 25 countries with over 12,000 employees.  During his 18-year tenure at Matthews, the Company has more than tripled in annual revenue, now producing approximately $1.8 billion in sales.   Brian has directed all legal matters for this publicly-traded corporation both nationally and internationally, as well as serving as a member of Matthews’ executive leadership team.  Mr. Walters has led over 75 domestic and foreign acquisition initiatives at Matthews, including extensive experience coordinating strategies to secure transaction approval from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, managing HSR filings, as well as filings with the competition authority of the European Union.

Brian Walters

Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Matthews International

Brian D. Walters serves as Executive Vice-President and General Counsel for Matthews International Corporation, Pittsburgh’s oldest company in continuous operation since 1850 and operating in over 25 countries with over 12,000 employees.  During his 18-year tenure at Matthews, the Company has more than tripled in annual revenue, now producing approximately $1.8 billion in sales.   Brian has directed all legal matters for this publicly-traded corporation both nationally and internationally, as well as serving as a member of Matthews’ executive leadership team.  Mr. Walters has led over 75 domestic and foreign acquisition initiatives at Matthews, including extensive experience coordinating strategies to secure transaction approval from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, managing HSR filings, as well as filings with the competition authority of the European Union.

Author:

Rob Rodrigues

Partner
RNA law

Rob Rodrigues

Partner
RNA law

Author:

Sheryl Garko

Partner
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

Sheryl Garko

Partner
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

Strategic collaborations are increasingly central to innovation, particularly in life sciences and technology, where companies rely on partnerships for research, development, and manufacturing. This session explores the trade secret considerations that arise across the full lifecycle of a collaboration, from early discussions and deal negotiation to active partnerships and potential disputes.

  • Trade secret strategy during early deal exploration and negotiating terms that protect the ownership of know-how, confidentiality obligations, and information access.
  • Offensive and defensive considerations when collaborations lead to litigation or misappropriation claims.
  • Managing trade secrets during active collaborations such as joint R&D, licensing, or manufacturing partnerships.
  • Trade secret risks when collaborations fail, including “busted deals,” employee mobility, and disputes over the use of shared know-how.

Author:

Carole Boelitz

VP, Global IP
Schneider Electric

Carole Boelitz

VP, Global IP
Schneider Electric

Trade secrets now sit far beyond R&D and the legal team. They run through data systems, manufacturing processes, vendor relationships, AI tools, and everyday employee workflows. As a result, effective trade secret protection increasingly depends on coordination between legal, HR, IT, security, engineering, and operations. This session focuses on how companies are adapting their internal structures to protect trade secrets as they spread across the organisation.

  • Why trade secrets are no longer confined to technical teams or formal IP portfolios.
  • How data systems, collaboration tools, and AI are expanding where trade secrets live.
  • The role of HR, IT, security, and operations in supporting trade secret protection.
  • Practical examples of cross-functional models that improve protection without slowing the business.

Author:

Doyon Won

Senior Counsel
Intellia Therapeutics Inc

Doyon Won

Senior Counsel
Intellia Therapeutics Inc

Author:

Greg Penoyer

Lead Product Counsel – Tech, IP and Supply Chain
SimpliSafe

Greg Penoyer

Lead Product Counsel – Tech, IP and Supply Chain
SimpliSafe

When trade secrets are misappropriated, companies face an early decision that can define the entire outcome of a dispute: whether to pursue civil litigation, seek arbitration, or involve the Department of Justice. This fireside session is led by a senior DOJ official and focuses on how these decisions are made in practice, including what the DOJ looks for when assessing potential trade secret cases and how those considerations should shape in-house strategy from day one.

  • How DOJ evaluates trade secret theft referrals, including evidence quality, victim cooperation, and jurisdictional factors.
  • When arbitration or civil litigation may be more effective than criminal referral.
  • Cost, disclosure, and control trade-offs across arbitration, court proceedings, and DOJ involvement.
  • How early choices affect leverage, timing, and the ability to pursue parallel proceedings.

Author:

Anand Patel

Senior Counsel
DOJ (Department of Justice)

Anand B. Patel is Senior Counsel in the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section at the Department of Justice.  He investigates and prosecutes trade secrets theft, ransomware attacks, and computer intrusions.  Mr. Patel teaches Trade Secrets Law at the George Washington University Law School.  Before joining the Department, Mr. Patel spent a decade as an attorney at Paul Hastings LLP, where he handled all facets of disputes involving trade secrets.  He previously served as law clerk to the Honorable William Bryson of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Mr. Patel graduated from UVA School of Law and MIT.

Anand Patel

Senior Counsel
DOJ (Department of Justice)

Anand B. Patel is Senior Counsel in the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section at the Department of Justice.  He investigates and prosecutes trade secrets theft, ransomware attacks, and computer intrusions.  Mr. Patel teaches Trade Secrets Law at the George Washington University Law School.  Before joining the Department, Mr. Patel spent a decade as an attorney at Paul Hastings LLP, where he handled all facets of disputes involving trade secrets.  He previously served as law clerk to the Honorable William Bryson of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Mr. Patel graduated from UVA School of Law and MIT.

 

Sam Burd

Chief Strategy Officer
Dell Technologies

Sam Burd

Chief Strategy Officer
Dell Technologies

Sam Burd

Chief Strategy Officer
Dell Technologies

Recent decisions show courts putting reverse engineering defences under the spotlight –
increasingly scrutinising how information is obtained, how AI tools are used, and whether access or contractual restrictions were breached. This session brings together a panel of in-house counsel, litigators, and technical experts to explore when reverse engineering defences are useful in practice, and what this means for enforcement and defence strategies.

  • When reverse engineering is treated as lawful versus when courts view it as a cover for misappropriation.
  • How courts assess claims of independent development and “clean room” processes in practice.
  • The growing importance of contractual restrictions, product terms, and access controls.
  • Lessons from recent disputes where reverse engineering arguments failed due to evidence of prior access or employee movement.
  • Practical steps companies are taking to protect against reverse engineering without over-claiming secrecy.

Author:

Clint Morrison

Partner
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Clint Morrison is a commercial litigator, trial lawyer, and problem solver. A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School who clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a former actor who previously worked at a government relations and public affairs firm, Clint brings a unique perspective to his work helping clients find creative, effective solutions to their most complex and consequential challenges.

 

Clint has extensive trial experience in federal and state courts throughout the country. Last year alone, Clint played a key role in two trial wins: a $2 billion jury verdict in a high-profile trade secrets case between two software companies (the largest verdict in the history of the State of Virginia), and a victory for client Howard University in a bench trial in the Southern District of New York establishing the University’s superior claim of title to a historically significantly work by the renowned artist Charles White.

 

Clint focuses on complex commercial litigation and litigates cases involving trade secrets and intellectual property, contractual and business disputes, false advertising and unfair competition, and whistleblower claims under the False Claims Act. Clint also maintains an active high-stakes art law practice.

 

Clint’s approach is to unpack the intellectual legal and factual puzzles in every case, identify the key themes and narratives underlying each dispute, and navigate each stage of a litigation with an eye towards building a compelling, winning case before a judge or jury.

 

Clint was named to the 2023 and 2024 editions of Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch, which recognizes outstanding professional excellence in private practice by attorneys who have typically been in practice for up to 10 years. He currently serves as the Secretary of the Federal Bar Council’s Public Service Committee.

Clint Morrison

Partner
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Clint Morrison is a commercial litigator, trial lawyer, and problem solver. A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School who clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a former actor who previously worked at a government relations and public affairs firm, Clint brings a unique perspective to his work helping clients find creative, effective solutions to their most complex and consequential challenges.

 

Clint has extensive trial experience in federal and state courts throughout the country. Last year alone, Clint played a key role in two trial wins: a $2 billion jury verdict in a high-profile trade secrets case between two software companies (the largest verdict in the history of the State of Virginia), and a victory for client Howard University in a bench trial in the Southern District of New York establishing the University’s superior claim of title to a historically significantly work by the renowned artist Charles White.

 

Clint focuses on complex commercial litigation and litigates cases involving trade secrets and intellectual property, contractual and business disputes, false advertising and unfair competition, and whistleblower claims under the False Claims Act. Clint also maintains an active high-stakes art law practice.

 

Clint’s approach is to unpack the intellectual legal and factual puzzles in every case, identify the key themes and narratives underlying each dispute, and navigate each stage of a litigation with an eye towards building a compelling, winning case before a judge or jury.

 

Clint was named to the 2023 and 2024 editions of Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch, which recognizes outstanding professional excellence in private practice by attorneys who have typically been in practice for up to 10 years. He currently serves as the Secretary of the Federal Bar Council’s Public Service Committee.

Author:

Carl Alexander Dinges

Partner
Bonabry

Carl Alexander Dinges

Partner
Bonabry

Author:

Eda Stark

Global IP Transactions & Litigation Managing Counsel
Olympus

Eda Stark

Global IP Transactions & Litigation Managing Counsel
Olympus

Author:

Jim Pooley

Indpedent attorney
James Pooley PLC

Jim Pooley

Indpedent attorney
James Pooley PLC

Author:

Victoria Cundiff

Adjunct Professor
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Victoria Cundiff

Adjunct Professor
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Regulatory and government disclosure obligations increasingly require companies to submit highly sensitive technical and commercial information that would otherwise qualify as trade secrets. Join this session to find out how in-house teams manage regulatory compliance without undermining future trade secret protection or litigation position.

  • Understand where US regulatory disclosures most commonly weaken trade secret claims, including FDA filings, cybersecurity reporting, and other mandatory submissions.
  • Learn how FOIA and government access risks are assessed in practice, and what courts look for when companies argue information remained confidential after disclosure.
  • Identify procurement and government contracting disclosures that can compromise trade secret protection, and how to mitigate those risks upfront.
  • Take away practical strategies for structuring regulatory submissions to preserve trade secret status and support reasonable-measures arguments in future disputes.

Author:

Kim Jessum

Chief IP Counsel
Heraeus

Kim Jessum

Chief IP Counsel
Heraeus

Author:

Matt Murphy

Partner
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Matt Murphy

Partner
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

2026 marks the tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), a landmark act that has brought previously unseen legal recognition and protection of trade secrets within the US. This keynote session will reflect on the progress made over the past ten years, key court decisions that continue to change the direction of trade secret legal protection, and predictions on how trade secret legal protection may continue to evolve.

 

Xenia Mastropetrou

Head of Product
Regrow Ag

Xenia Mastropretrou is Head of Product at Regrow, where she leads the development of SaaS solutions that help food and agriculture companies understand, reduce, and report emissions through regenerative agriculture programs. With a background spanning climate tech, CPG, and heavy industry, she has worked with companies including Ecolab, Kelvin, and PepsiCo to drive sustainability, operational efficiency, and growth.

Xenia Mastropetrou

Head of Product
Regrow Ag

Xenia Mastropetrou

Head of Product
Regrow Ag

Xenia Mastropretrou is Head of Product at Regrow, where she leads the development of SaaS solutions that help food and agriculture companies understand, reduce, and report emissions through regenerative agriculture programs. With a background spanning climate tech, CPG, and heavy industry, she has worked with companies including Ecolab, Kelvin, and PepsiCo to drive sustainability, operational efficiency, and growth.

Xenia holds an MBA from Kellogg School of Management and a BSc in Management Science & Technology from Athens University of Economics and Business. She is also an active member of the World Economic Forum Global Shapers Community and a founding member of Re-Generation, an initiative focused on addressing youth unemployment in Greece.