Biologics Patent Litigation: A Review of How Disputes are Shifting, and Strategy is Adapting | Kisaco Research

Biologics litigation is evolving beyond classic biosimilar disputes, driven by higher-value products, an uptake in branded-vs-branded disputes, and growing injunction risk. This session brings together leading litigators and in-house counsel to examine how strategy is changing.

  • How biologics disputes are starting earlier and outside traditional biosimilar timelines, (e.g. Novo Nordisk v. Eli Lilly), and what this means for launch and portfolio strategy.
  • Examine the rise of branded-vs-branded cases like Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Moderna, Inc., and how innovator enforcement and defence strategies are adapting.
  • Review recent BPCIA cases and outcomes, including Hikma/Richter v. Amgen.
  • Consider parallel proceedings in Europe and other jurisdictions and examine how they’re increasingly shaping U.S. biologics litigation decisions.
Speaker(s): 

Author:

Nicole Clouse

VP & Head of IP
Generate Biomedicines

Nicole Clouse

VP & Head of IP
Generate Biomedicines

Author:

Katie Nolan Stevaux

Assistant General Counsel
Genentech

Katie Nolan Stevaux

Assistant General Counsel
Genentech
Time: 
12:00pm – 12:45pm
Agenda Track No.: 
Track 3
Session Type: 
Track
Force Inline Description: 
0